#Apple pages review how to
Here we discuss the innovation benefits and leadership challenges of Apple’s distinctive and ever-evolving organizational model, which may be useful for individuals and companies wanting to better understand how to succeed in rapidly changing environments. As the importance of artificial intelligence and other new areas has increased, that structure has changed. Read more aboutĪpple’s commitment to a functional organization does not mean that its structure has remained static. Apple proves that this conventional approach is not necessary and that the functional structure may benefit companies facing tremendous technological change and industry upheaval.
By the latter half of the century the vast majority of large corporations had followed suit. companies such as DuPont and General Motors moved from a functional to a multidivisional structure in the early 20th century. As the Harvard Business School historian Alfred Chandler documented, U.S.
#Apple pages review full
Giving business unit leaders full control over key functions allows them to do what is best to meet the needs of their individual units’ customers and maximize their results, and it enables the executives overseeing them to assess their performance. In effect, besides the CEO, the company operates with no conventional general managers: people who control an entire process from product development through sales and are judged according to a P&L statement.īusiness history and organizational theory make the case that as entrepreneurial firms grow large and complex, they must shift from a functional to a multidivisional structure to align accountability and control and prevent the congestion that occurs when countless decisions flow up the org chart to the very top. As was the case with Jobs before him, CEO Tim Cook occupies the only position on the organizational chart where the design, engineering, operations, marketing, and retail of any of Apple’s main products meet. Senior vice presidents are in charge of functions, not products. What is surprising-in fact, remarkable-is that Apple retains it today, even though the company is nearly 40 times as large in terms of revenue and far more complex than it was in 1998. The adoption of a functional structure may have been unsurprising for a company of Apple’s size at the time.
Believing that conventional management had stifled innovation, Jobs, in his first year returning as CEO, laid off the general managers of all the business units (in a single day), put the entire company under one P&L, and combined the disparate functional departments of the business units into one functional organization. As is often the case with decentralized business units, managers were inclined to fight with one another, over transfer prices in particular. General managers ran the Macintosh products group, the information appliances division, and the server products division, among others.
It was divided into business units, each with its own P&L responsibilities. When Jobs arrived back at Apple, it had a conventional structure for a company of its size and scope. Much less well known are the organizational design and the associated leadership model that have played a crucial role in the company’s innovation success. Thanks to them, it grew from some 8,000 employees and $7 billion in revenue in 1997, the year Steve Jobs returned, to 137,000 employees and $260 billion in revenue in 2019. Apple is well known for its innovations in hardware, software, and services.
0 kommentar(er)
